DANIEL TORRES, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DANIEL TORRES, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
802 So. 2d 412
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. United States v. Standridge, 810 F. 2d 1034 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1072, 107 S.Ct. 2468, 95 L.Ed.2d 877 (1987); State v. Glatzmayer, 789 So. 2d 297 (Fla.2001); Wike v. State, 596 So. 2d 1020 (Fla.1992).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Torres v. State, 184 So. 3d 1239 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)…r minimum mandatory provision appears to have been a scrivener’s error as it is inconsistent with a life sentence without parole and not in compliance with the sentencing statute in effect at the time the crime was committed. . See Torres v. State, 802 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Glatzmayer, 789 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 2001)
- United States v. Standridge, 810 F.2d 1034 (11th Cir. 1987)
- Goldberg v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 481 U.S. 1072 (U.S. 1987)
- Ratcliff v. United States, 481 U.S. 1072 (U.S. 1987)
- Warfield Raymond Wike, Jr. v. State, 596 So. 2d 1020 (Fla. 1992)