DANIEL TORRES, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Daniel Torres, convicted as a juvenile of first-degree murder and armed robbery, challenges his mandatory life sentences without parole. The court holds that Miller v. Alabama applies retroactively to juvenile offenders and requires resentencing under Florida's 2014-220 statutory framework for both homicide and non-homicide offenses.
Miller v. Alabama applies retroactively to juvenile offenders like Torres whose sentences became final prior to the Miller decision. Both the life sentence for first-degree murder and the life sentence for armed robbery are subject to resentencing in conformance with chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida.
[1] A mandatory life sentence without parole for a juvenile offender convicted of first-degree murder is unconstitutional.
[2] The Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. …
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“A sentencing framework that mandates life in prison without possibility of parole for juvenile offenders is unconstitutional.”
Establishes the core constitutional principle invalidating Torres' sentences under Miller and Graham.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceIn 1997, Torres was charged with first-degree murder and robbery with a weapon. He received mandatory life sentences without parole for both convictio…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion For Clarification cases and more on FLexlaw
ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
We grant appellee’s, State of Florida’s, Motion for Clarification, and withdraw this Court’s previous opinion dated December 23, 2015, and substitute in its place the following opinion.
Daniel Torres appeals the denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion in which he argued that his life sentences without the possibility of parole for his convictions of first degree murder and armed robbery were illegal, pursuant to Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), and Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), for offenses that occurred when Torres was a juvenile. We reverse and remand for resentencing of both counts.
In 1997, the State charged Torres with first degree murder and robbery with a weapon. Torres received a mandatory life sentence without parole with a twenty-five year minimum mandatory on count one for the first degree murder conviction.1 He received a second life sentence without parole with a three-year minimum mandatory on count two for the armed robbery conviction. This Court affirmed his convictions.2
The trial court denied Torres’ request for resentencing on count one based on Geter v. State, 115 So.3d 375, 384 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), which held that Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. —, —, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 2469, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), cannot be retroactively applied to “juvenile homicide offenders whose convictions and sentences were final as of June 25, 2012, the date *1241 Miller was issued.” The trial court also denied Torres’ motion based on Lawton v. State, 109 So.3d 825, 828-29 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013), in which this Court held that a juvenile offender can be legally sentenced to life imprisonment without parole for a non-homicide charge as long as the offense was committed out of the same criminal episode as a corresponding homicide, and thereby created an exception to Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 74-75, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010). Lawton, 109 So.3d at 828-30.
Torres is entitled to resentencing on both counts. A sentencing framework that mandates life in prison without possibility of parole for juvenile offenders is unconstitutional. Miller, 132 S.Ct. at 2469; Graham, 560 U.S. at 80, 130 S.Ct. 2011. Miller applies retroactively to defendants like Torres who were juveniles at the time of a homicide offense and whose.sentences became final prior to the Miller decision. Falcon v. State, 162 So.3d 954, 956 (Fla.2015). The appropriate remedy for a juvenile offender whose sentence is unconstitutional under Miller is resentencing in conformance with chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida, provided they present the court with a timely rule 3.850 motion. See §§ 775.082, 921.1401, 921.1402, Fla. Stat. (2015). See also Horsley v. State, 160 So.3d 393 (Fla.2015); Wadley v. State, 178 So.3d 424 (Fla.3d DCA 2015).
The State agrees that Torres is entitled to resentencing on count two for the non-homicide offense of armed robbery but argues that the appropriate remedy is re-sentencing pursuant to the applicable governing statute for the subject offense, and not pursuant to chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida, in cases that involve violations under Graham. We conclude that Torres’ life sentence for the non-homicide offense is also subject to resentencing in conformance with chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida. See Wadley v. State, 178 So.3d 424 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)(involving a sentence of life in prison without parole for murder in the first degree and armed robbery, vacating life sentences for both homicide and non-homicide offenses, and remanding for resentencing pursuant to chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida). Torres is thus entitled to resentencing on both counts, pursuant to chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida.
We therefore reverse the trial court’s denial of Torres’ 3.850 motion. We remand this case for resentencing on both counts, pursuant to chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida, as codified in sections 775.082, 921.1401, 921.1402, Florida Statutes (2015).
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (U.S. 2012)
- Horsley v. State, 160 So. 3d 393 (Fla. 2015)
- Graham v. Florida (1st Cir. 2010)
- Falcon v. State, 162 So. 3d 954 (Fla. 2015)
- Drewery Geter v. State, 115 So. 3d 375 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)
- Torrence Lawton v. State, 109 So. 3d 825 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)
- Wadley v. State, 178 So. 3d 424 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)
- Torres v. State, 802 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)