LESTER STRETCHER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
LESTER STRETCHER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
803 So. 2d 813
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 34 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So. 2d 550, 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001):
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
KLEIN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (17 total)
-
LaMarr Love v. State, 814 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)…viction motion, but certifying question to supreme court), rev. granted, 797 So. 2d 586 (Fla.2001). This court too recently certified the question certified in Major, while affirming the denial of relief based on this ground. See Stretcher v. State, 803 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). However, as reflected in Smith, this court treats the [*478] allegation of affirmative misadvice of counsel differently. See also Jones v. State, 804 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (declining to stay case or certify it to supreme…
-
Washington v. State, 810 So. 2d 972 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)…PER CURIAM. As we did in Stretcher v. State, 803 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), we affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So. 2d 550, 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001): WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNS…
-
Doyle v. State, 807 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)…PER CURIAM. We affirm the order summarily denying appellant’s motion for postconviction relief, seeking to vacate his conviction based on the alleged involuntariness of his plea. See Stretcher v. State, 803 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). As we did in Stretcher, we certify the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So. 2d 550, 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY…
Previewing 3 of 17 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Fritz Major v. State, 790 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)