JOE WASHINGTON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOE WASHINGTON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
810 So. 2d 972
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2002)
Caution
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
As we did in Stretcher v. State, 803 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), we affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So. 2d 550, 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001):
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEPENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
SHAHOOD, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Rabb, 920 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…m the street. Based upon a clear line of precedent, the space in front of the door enjoyed no constitutional protection. The Fourth Amendment does not necessarily protect areas of a home which are “open and exposed to public view.” State v. Duhart, 810 So. 2d 972, 973 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); see also California v. Ciraolo, 476 U.S. 207, 213-14, 106 S.Ct. 1809, 90 L.Ed.2d 210 (1986). Moreover, “one does not harbor an expectation of privacy on a front porch where salesmen or visitors may appear at any time.” Sta…
-
State v. Joelis Jardines, 9 So. 3d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…6, 103 S.Ct. 2637 (quoting United, Staten v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1, 7, 97 S.Ct. 2476, 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977)). However “[t]he Fourth Amendment does not necessarily protect areas of a home which are ‘open and exposed to public view.’ ” State v. Duhart, 810 So. 2d 972, 973 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). While this right to, and expectation of, privacy, no doubt, extends to the contents of a home, we need not resolve the extent to which this constitutional protection extends to every entryway in every possible factual scen…
-
State v. Rabb, 881 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…om the street. Based upon a long line of precedent, the space in front of the door enjoyed no constitutional protection. The Fourth Amendment does not necessarily protect areas of a home which are “open and exposed to public view.” State v. Duhart, 810 So. 2d 972, 973 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); see also California v. Ciraolo, 476 U.S. 207, 213-14, 106 S.Ct. 1809, 90 L.Ed.2d 210 (1986). Moreover, “one does not harbor an expectation of privacy on a front porch where salesmen or visitors may appear at any time.” Sta…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Fritz Major v. State, 790 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
- Stretcher v. State, 803 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)