ROBERT J. REARDON, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
ROBERT J. REARDON, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
806 So. 2d 446
Florida Supreme Court (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of the decision in State v. Reardon, 763 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on alleged express and direct conflict with Thompson v. State, 650 So. 2d 969 (Fla.1994), Goodwin v. State, 634 So. 2d 157 (Fla.1994), and Sirmons v. State, 634 So. 2d 153 (Fla.1994). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Florida, 894 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 2005)…n the true core offenses of the crimes in this case. In an analysis pursuant to Sirmons, the core offense of aggravated battery is obviously battery, its core element. See State v. Reardon, 763 So. 2d 418, 420 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), review dismissed, 806 So. 2d 446 (Fla.2002). Ascertaining the core offense of attempted second-degree murder is more difficult. A completed homicide is a core offense in itself. See Beltran, 700 So. 2d at 135 (“As Justice Kogan noted in Sirmons, homicide is its own core offense.”).…
-
In re Certification of Need for Additional Judges, 842 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 2003)…2.035(b)(2), we certify the need for one additional district court judge for the Second District and one for the Fourth District. These two judgeships were also certified in last year’s opinion, see In re Certification of Need for Additional Judges, 806 So. 2d 446, 448 (Fla.2002), but not legislatively authorized and funded. We note that the district courts of appeal have been very conservative in their requests for additional judgeships over the last ten years in spite of significantly increasing caseloads.…1 / 3
-
Reeves v. State, 57 So. 3d 874 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)…and possession of a destructive device under the facts of the present case violates double jeopardy principles. See Young v. State, 43 So. 3d 876 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010); State v. Reardon, 763 So. 2d 418, 419 n. 3 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), review dismissed, 806 So. 2d 446 (Fla.2002). As we are required under the principle of lenity to read the verdicts rendered in the present case in a manner that would give the benefit of the doubt to the defendant, we further conclude that the convictions of possession or dischargi…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Sirmons v. State, 634 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 1994)
- Thompson v. State, 650 So. 2d 969 (Fla. 1994)
- State v. Reardon, 763 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)
- Goodwin v. State, 634 So. 2d 157 (Fla. 1994)