SOUTHEASTERN IRON WORKERS HEALTH CARE PLAN, APPELLANT,
v.
HOWARD A. ENGLE, M.D., ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 2002-04-17
No. 3D00-3470
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and FLETCHER, JJ.
813 So. 2d 290 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion to intervene. We affirm. See Florida Wildlife Fed’n, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Internal Improvement, 707 So. 2d 841, 842 (Fla. 5th DCA) (holding that “intervention is a matter of a court’s discretion”), review denied, 718 So. 2d 167 (Fla.1998); Hatcher v. Roberts, 478 So. 2d 1083, 1086 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), review denied, 488 So. 2d 68 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Bruce v. Hollingsworth, 820 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
    …PER CURIAM. No abuse of discretion has been demonstrated in the order under review terminating the status of the appellant as an intervening plaintiff in a class action proceeding. See Southeastern Iron Workers Health Care Plan v. Engle, 813 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Florida Wildlife Fed’n, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Internal Improvement, 707 So. 2d 841 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), review denied, 718 So. 2d 167 (Fla.1998); Hatcher v. Roberts, 478 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), review denied, 488…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw