ROBERT W. BRUCE, D.C., APPELLANT,
v.
BETH HOLLINGSWORTH, ET AL., APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
No abuse of discretion has been demonstrated in the order under review terminating the status of the appellant as an intervening plaintiff in a class action proceeding. See Southeastern Iron Workers Health Care Plan v. Engle, 813 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Florida Wildlife Fed’n, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Internal Improvement, 707 So. 2d 841 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), review denied, 718 So. 2d 167 (Fla.1998); Hatcher v. Roberts, 478 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), review denied, 488 So. 2d 68 (Fla.1986). We observe that the order and its affirmance are necessarily without prejudice to an application, if appropriate, by the appellant for intervention in the future. See Belfort v. Falowski 749 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Redwin Anderson Wilchcombe v. State, 842 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…tory sentences on charges all arising from the same criminal episode. We agree with Wilchcombe that the trial judge was mistaken in this regard, on the basis stated in Mondesir v. State, 814 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). See also Williams v. State 820 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)(affirm-ing concurrent minimum mandatory sentences under Section 775.087); Stafford v. State, 818 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)(remanding for trial court to exercise its discretion in deciding whether to impose consecutive sentenc…
-
Deron Delarease Green v. State, 845 So. 2d 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…ny offense. This provision does not explicitly prohibit a judge from imposing the minimum mandatory sentences concurrent to each other. (e.s.) Mondesir, 814 So. 2d at 1173. See Roberts v. State, 834 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Williams v. State, 820 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 3d [*896] DCA 2002); Stafford v. State, 818 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). Furthermore, the Florida Supreme Court has held that, absent specific legislative authorization, minimum mandatory enhancement sentences arising from a single crimina…
-
Sousa v. State, 868 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…rrently. See also Green v. State, 845 So. 2d 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Wilchcombe v. State, 842 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Roberts v. State, 834 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Sehnal v. State, 826 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Williams v. State, 820 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Stafford v. State, 818 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Tunsil v. State, 797 So. 2d 651 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). Because we agree with Mondesir that this language does not provide the legislative authorization necessary to require con…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Kirkland v. Fla. Dep't of Corr., 2006 WL 3755195 (N.D. Fla. 2024)
- Hatcher v. B.K. Roberts, 478 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
- Fla. Wildlife Fed'n, Inc. v. Bd. OF Trs. OF the Internal Improvement, 707 So. 2d 841 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
- Belfort v. Frank J. Falowski, M.D., 749 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
- Pitts v. State, 813 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)
- Southeastern Iron Workers Health Care Plan v. Howard A. Engle, M.D., 813 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)