V.G., MOTHER OF C.E., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
V.G. appeals from adjudication and disposition orders finding her daughter C.E. dependent due to neglect. The trial court found that V.G. delayed seeking medical treatment for several days after her ten-month-old daughter suffered a broken arm, and the appellate court affirmed based on sufficient evidence of neglect.
The trial court's finding of dependency was supported by competent substantial evidence. The child suffered a severe injury that went untreated for several days, and V.G. acted in a dismissive and casual manner regarding the care and protection of this young child, constituting neglect.
[1] The standard of review for sufficiency of the evidence in dependency cases is whether the trial court's findings are supported by competent substantial evidence.
[2] A child is considered dependent if neglected, abandoned, or abused.
Previewing 2 of 6 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The standard of review on the issue of sufficiency of the evidence in dependency cases is whether the trial court's findings are supported by competent substantial evidence.”
Establishes the appellate standard of review applicable to dependency cases.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceTen-month-old C.E. suffered a broken humerus (upper arm). V.G. delayed seeking medical care for several days after the injury occurred. Medical expert…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Definition Of Neglect cases and more on FLexlaw
V.G. appeals from adjudication and disposition orders which determined her daughter, C.E. was dependent, as to her. The trial court found the Department proved its ease by a preponderance of the evidence. After examining the record, we agree and affirm. The standard of review on the issue of sufficiency of the evidence in dependency cases is whether the trial court’s findings are supported by competent substantial evidence. G.C. v. Department of Children and Families, 791 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).
The event leading to the trial court’s finding of dependency was the delay (several days) between the time ten-month-old C.E. suffered a broken humerus (upper arm) and the time that V.G. sought medical help for her. The court expressly found the testimony of the Department’s expert, Dr. Seibel, Medical Director of the Child Protection Team, was credible and that V.G.’s was not. Dr. Seibel testified the type of fracture suffered by C.E. would have required direct trauma to that part of the arm and it could not have been caused by the child trying to walk and then falling. He also said the x-rays showed there was a degree of cortical reaction, indicating the injury had occurred several days before the child was seen at the hospital, that the child would have been expressing pain over that period of time, and would not have been able to use her arm normally.
V.G. claimed she had no idea how the child broke her arm and she insisted C.E. had only been injured the day she sought medical care for her. The trial court said it did not believe V.G.’s testimony. It found V.G. an incompetent parent because she did not know how her child was hurt and she was neglectful in caring for her. A dependent child is one who has been neglected, abandoned or abused. See W.T. v. Department of Children and Families, 787 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). “Neglect” occurs when a child is deprived of or is allowed to be deprived of necessary food, clothing, shelter or medical treatment or a child is permitted to live in an environment which causes a child’s physical, mental or emotional health to be significantly impaired or endangered. § 39.01(45), Fla. Stat. The evidence in this case was sufficient to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the child suffered a severe injury which went untreated for several days,1 and that V.G. acted in a “dismissive” and “casual” manner as to the care and protection of this young child.
AFFIRMED.
COBB and PALMER, JJ., concur. . See In the Interest of D.J.W., 764 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
F.R. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 826 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…denied because this appeal was perfected and ready for assignment to a decision panel, while the mother’s case was not. . C.M. v. Department of Children and Families, 823 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); V.G. v. Department of Children and Families, 813 So. 2d 298 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); G.C. v. Department of Children and Families, 791 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), mand. denied, 807 So. 2d 653 (Fla.2002). . Department of Children and Families v. L.T., 799 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); D.D. v. Department of C…
-
L.W. and P.G. v. Fla. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 829 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)…their child dependent. We affirm. [*939] Addressing first the order adjudicating the child dependent as to the mother, we find that there is competent substantial record evidence to support the court’s findings. V.G. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 813 So. 2d 298 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). The Department presented evidence of neglect as the child was permitted to live in an environment that could significantly impair or endanger the child’s mental, physical or emotional health. § 39.01(45), Fla. Stat. (2000); V.G.…
-
S.P. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 866 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…that the order should be reversed because there was no evidence that she inflicted injuries upon S.M. and R.M. An order of dependency will be upheld if it is supported by competent, substantial evidence. V.G. v. Department of Children and Families, 813 So. 2d 298 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). In the instant case, the trial court’s finding [*1255] that the abuse could not have occurred without the mother’s knowledge and that the children’s physical, mental, and emotional health were in danger either by acts of abuse b…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- G.C. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 791 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
- Gourley v. State, 787 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
- Murray v. State, 764 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
- In the Interest of D.J.W. v. State, 764 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)