THOMAS C. KEARNS, APPELLANT,
v.
8911 NORMANDY BEACH, INC., APPELLEE
THOMAS C. KEARNS, APPELLANT,
8911 NORMANDY BEACH, INC., APPELLEE
814 So. 2d 516
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See The Florida Bar v. Joy, 679 So. 2d 1165, 1167 (Fla.1996) (citing United Am. Bank of Cent. Fla., Inc. v. Seligman, 599 So. 2d 1014, 1016 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)), (“In the absence of an express agreement, written or oral, the law will imply from the circumstances of the escrow that the agent has undertaken a legal obligation (l).to know the provisions and conditions of the principal agreement concerning the escrowed property, and (2) to exercise reasonable skill and ordinary diligence in holding and delivering possession of the escrowed property (i.e., to disburse the escrowed funds) in strict accordance with the principals’ agreement.”).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
van Poyck v. State, 816 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)…PER CURIAM. Defendant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is barred as successive. See, e.g., Walker v. State, 814 So. 2d 516 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). “The defendant is abusing the judicial process by filing successive motions that attempt to litigate issues that were, could, or should have been raised either on direct appeal or in his previous motions.” Duncan v. State, 728 So…
-
Javon Mason v. State, 973 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…further notices of appeal, motions, or petitions for post-conviction or extraordinary relief arising out of any or all of the captioned circuit court case numbers unless such pleadings are signed by a member of The Florida Bar. See Walker v. State, 814 So. 2d 516, 517 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Affirmed.…
-
Wright v. State, 239 So. 3d 156 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
Authorities Cited
- THE Florida BAR v. JOY, 679 So. 2d 1165 (Fla. 1996)
- United Am. Bank OF Cent. Fla., Inc. v. Seligman, 599 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)