JEFFREY HOWARD VAN POYCK, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JEFFREY HOWARD VAN POYCK, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
816 So. 2d 208
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Defendant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is barred as successive. See, e.g., Walker v. State, 814 So. 2d 516 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). “The defendant is abusing the judicial process by filing successive motions that attempt to litigate issues that were, could, or should have been raised either on direct appeal or in his previous motions.” Duncan v. State, 728 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Duncan v. State, 728 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
- Kearns v. 8911 Normandy Beach, Inc., 814 So. 2d 516 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)