GUSTAV MENGEL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
GUSTAV MENGEL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
814 So. 2d 1210
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm on the authority of Docanto v. State, 811 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Hope v. State, 805 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Erts v. State, 791 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Peterson v. State, 775 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Hall v. State, 767 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), rev. granted, 790 So. 2d 1104 (Fla.2001)
AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tobias v. State, 828 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)…ed the case on the months that the defendant failed to report. The defendant argues, and we agree, that the only evidence on this claim was hearsay. An allegation based solely on hearsay cannot be the basis for a finding of guilt. Gonzalez v. State, 814 So. 2d 1210 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). Probation office records concerning the defendant’s history of reporting might have been admissible under the business records exception to the hearsay rule, but the State did not choose to introduce them. The finding of guilt o…
-
Fleitas v. State, 835 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…ty to correct any error.”), citing Castor v. State, 365 So. 2d 701, 703 (Fla.1978). A probation violation hearing is subject to the same Florida Evidence Code as any other hearing with the exception that hearsay is admissible. See Gonzalez v. State, 814 So. 2d 1210, 1211 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). Affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- Peterson v. State, 775 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
- Artis J. Kelly v. State, 767 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
- Wester v. State, 767 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
- Adaberto Docanto v. State, 811 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
- Hope v. State, 805 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
- Erts v. State, 791 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)