HAROLD GAINES, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Fla. Dep't OF the Lottery v. Gtech Corp., 822 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. 2002)
  …isdiction to review a decision of the First District Court of Appeal. See art. V § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Subsequently, for purposes of oral argument, we consolidated for review two cases that arose out of Florida Department of Lottery v. Gtech Corp., 816 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), on motion for certification, 816 So. 2d at 655 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), wherein the district court certified two questions to be of great public importance. Upon reflection, and further consideration, we now conclude that review was…
• Emerald Corr. Mgmt. v. BAY Cnty. Bd. OF Cnty. Comm'rs, 955 So. 2d 647 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)
  …urthermore, a public body is not entitled to omit or alter material provisions required by the RFP because in doing so the public body fails to “inspire public confidence in the fairness of the [RFP] process.” State, Dep’t of Lottery v. Gtech Corp., 816 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). In Gtech, this court reviewed a trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of an unsuccessful RFP respondent. Id. at 649. The underlying action, like the action in the instant case, sought declaratory relief and requested…
• AT & T Corp. v. State, 201 So. 3d 852 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)
  …, which found an agency could not treat the RFP process as an initial ranking tool to determine a preferred provider and then negotiate a contract with that provider without limitation and without regard for the original proposal and RFP parameters. 816 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Section 287.012, Florida Statutes (2014), defines “invitation to negotiate” as “a written or electronically posted solicitation for competitive sealed replies to select one or more vendors .with which to commence negotiations fo…

Authorities Cited

• Knight v. State, 791 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)