JOHN THOMAS SCHNEIDER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Mandate cases and more on FLexlaw
FULMER, Judge.
John Thomas Schneider appeals the order of the trial court refusing to resentence him on case number 90-998 in accordance with the mandate of this court issued in Schneider v. State, 788 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (hereinafter “Schneider I”). The trial court concluded that resentencing was unnecessary because Schneider had already been resen-tenced in that case prior to the issuance of our mandate. Schneider argues and we agree that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to resentence Schneider prior to the issuance of our mandate. See Washington v. State, 637 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We therefore reverse the trial court’s order and remand the case for Schneider to be resentenced on counts I and III of case number 90-998 in accordance with the mandate issued in Schneider I.
Reversed and remanded for resentencing. _
BLUE, C.J., and KELLY, J„ Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gandy v. State, 846 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 2003)…ctly conflicts with a decision of another district court of appeal on the same question of law. The decision from the First District in Goodwin’s case reads in its entirety: “PER CURIAM. DENIED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(4)(B).” Goodwin v. State, 825 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Goodwin asserts in her notice to invoke that the First District’s decision in her case expressly declares valid a state statute. Goodwin asserts in her notice that the “state statute” declared valid in the First District’s decis…
Authorities Cited
- Schneider v. State, 788 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
- Washington v. State, 637 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)