BRUCE ALLISON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2002-09-06
No. 2D01-729
BLUE, C.J., and STRINGER and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
825 So. 2d 504 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Bruce Alison challenges his judgment and sentences for sexual battery, sexual battery with a deadly weapon, and aggravated battery. We affirm the judgment and sentences without discussion but remand with directions to correct a scrivener’s error in the written sentences.

The trial court orally pronounced prison releasee reoffender sanctions for count three, sexual battery with a deadly weapon; however the written sentence reflects that these sanctions were imposed for count two, aggravated battery. On remand, the written sentence shall be corrected so that it comports with the court’s oral pronouncement. See Arrington v. State, 805 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), dismissed, Brooks v. State, 768 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Afirmed.

BLUE, C.J., and STRINGER and DAVIS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Leppert v. State, 850 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
    …orally announced by the trial court are legal; however, the written sentences in cases 98-3929-CF, 98-4052-CF, and 99-16-CF do not comport with the oral pronouncements and must be remanded for correction of scrivener’s errors. See Allison v. State, 825 So. 2d 504, 504 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Accordingly, we affirm the convictions, affirm the sentence imposed in case 99-17-CF; and remand the sentences in cases 98-3929-CF, 98-4052-CF, and 99-16-CF for correction of scrivener’s errors. Affirmed and remanded. AL…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw