ERIC HUGH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ERIC HUGH, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
826 So. 2d 1103
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) (to be entitled to relief, the defendant must show that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense and that there is a reasonable probability that, but for the deficiency, the result of the proceeding would have been different).
THOMPSON, C.J., SAWAYA and PLEUS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
O'Neal v. State, 862 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…ffender sentence was unnecessary for the protection of the public. O’Neal next argues, and the State correctly concedes, that O’Neal’s written judgment erroneously reflects a habitual offender sentence for possession of cocaine. See Tyler v. State, 826 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Consequently, we remand to the trial court to strike from the written sentencing order the habitual offender sanction for possession of cocaine. O’Neal’s presence is not required for this ministerial function. Affirmed in part;…
-
Edison v. State, 848 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…ablish that the qualifying convictions were sentenced separately, the State has not met its burden of proving that Edison qualified as an HFO. Accordingly, we reverse. On remand, the State may again seek HFO treatment, if applicable. Tyler v. State, 826 So. 2d 1103, 1104 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); May v. State, 713 So. 2d 1087, 1088 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Reversed and remanded. NORTHCUTT and KELLY, JJ„ Concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984)