WILLIE REESE WALKER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2002-10-23
No. 3D02-2427
Before JORGENSON, COPE, and GODERICH, JJ.
828 So. 2d 501 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See, e.g., Weford v. State, 784 So. 2d 1222, 1223-1224 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (holding that prior sentencing as a youthful offender does not preclude consideration in habitual offender proceeding of such crimes as predicate offenses); Gadsen v. State, 805 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Whitfield v. Singletary, 730 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); see also Arce v. State, 762 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (affirming the denial of motion to correct sentence under Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla.2000) where defendant was sentenced as a habitual offender).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw