JAGADA CHAMBERS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Botterbusch v. Botterbusch, 851 So. 2d 903 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
  …of the parties since the entry of the custody and visitation order; and (2) that the welfare of the child will be promoted by a change in custody and visitation.’ ” Chapman v. Prevatt, 845 So. 2d 976, 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (quoting Knipe v. Knipe, 840 So. 2d 335, 339-40 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)). A primary residential parent’s decision to relocate, “in the absence of other compelling circumstances, does not in and of itself support a change of custody.” Id. AFFIRMED. FARMER, C.J., SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concu…
• Segarra v. Segarra, 947 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
  …rns apply to modification of any aspect of the final judgment. Wade, 903 So. 2d at 934 (“The substantial change test articulated herein applies to the modification of a divorce decree providing for the custody and care of a child.”); Knipe v. Knipe, 840 So. 2d 335, 339-40 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (citations omitted)(applying the substantial change test to petitions seeking modification of visitation). The existence of a substantial change must be alleged on the face of the petition. Bartolotta v. Bartolotta, 687…
• Chamberlain v. Eisinger, 159 So. 3d 185 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)
  …en the change of circumstances has occurred over a substantial period of time.” Id. When modifying a parenting and time-sharing plan, the primary consideration is the best interest of the children. § 61.13(3), Fla. Stat. (2012); see Knipe v. Knipe, 840 So. 2d 335, 339-40 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Courts must evaluate all relevant statutory factors affecting the welfare and interests of the child. See § 61.13(3), Fla. Stat. (2012). On appeal, the Mother argues the trial court erred in finding a substantial and ma…