G. A. TYLER, W. P. WILKINSON, W. C. JACKSON, W. H. MCBRIDE AND C. B. JONES, AS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND AS CONSTITUTING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND MILLARD B. CONKLIN, SOMETIMES KNOWN AS M. B. CONKLIN, A RESIDENT OF VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLANTS,
v.
J. E. PEACOCK, PERSONALLY AND AS NOMINEE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FOR THE OFFICE OF COUNTY JUDGE IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, NOMINATED IN THE PRIMARY ELECTION HELD JUNE 5TH, 1928, APPELLEE
G. A. TYLER, W. P. WILKINSON, W. C. JACKSON, W. H. MCBRIDE AND C. B. JONES, AS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND AS CONSTITUTING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND MILLARD B. CONKLIN, SOMETIMES KNOWN AS M. B. CONKLIN, A RESIDENT OF VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLANTS,
J. E. PEACOCK, PERSONALLY AND AS NOMINEE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FOR THE OFFICE OF COUNTY JUDGE IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, NOMINATED IN THE PRIMARY ELECTION HELD JUNE 5TH, 1928, APPELLEE
98 Fla. 981
Florida Supreme Court (1929)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This was a suit to prohibit the Board of County Commissioners of Volusia County placing the name of a certain person on the ballot to be used in the general election of 1928, to be voted for for the office ofCounty Judge.
The issues are moot and, therefore, the cause should be dismissed. It is so ordered.
Dismissed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J.,. concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gill v. City OF N. Miami Beach, 156 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)…ve become moot.1 [*183] Accordingly, this appeal should'be and is ■dismissed on our own motion without prejudice to the right of the appellant to pursue such other action for relief as he may be .advised. Appeal dismissed. . See: Tyler v. Peacock, 98 Fla. 981, 124 So. 463; Barrs v. Peacock, 65 Fla. 12, 61 So. 118; Coursen v. City of South Daytona, Fla.App.1961, 127 So. 2d 905.…
-
Nathan v. Dep't of State, 265 So. 3d 656 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)
-
Wells v. Cochrane, 137 Fla. 241 (Fla. 1939)…8 and the court’s order refusing to restrain the holding of the election is now moot as the time therefor elapsed. See City of St. Petersburg v. Clark, 127 Fla. 232, 166 So. 563; Alabama Coal Co. v. Bowden, 44 Fla. 163, 31 So. 820; Tyler v. Peacock, 98 Fla. 981, 124 So. 463; Hogan v. State, ex rel. Williams, 86 Fla. 361, 98 So. 70; Yent v. State, ex rel. Richardson, 66 Fla. 336, 63 So. 452; McCormick v. Bond, 75 Fla. 819, 78 So. 681; Du-Bose v. Meister, 92 Fla. 995, 110 So. 546. It is contended that this…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence