BRUCE FREDERIC NATHAN
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF ELECTIONS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appeal challenging a decision by the Department of State, Division of Elections is dismissed when the underlying controversy becomes moot.
[1] An appeal becomes moot and subject to dismissal when the underlying dispute no longer presents a live controversy capable of judicial resolution.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBruce Frederic Nathan appealed a Circuit Court decision regarding the Department of State, Division of Elections. The Appellee Department of State fil…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
January 14, 2019 PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of Appellee’s suggestion of mootness, filed on December 5, 2018, and Appellant’s response thereto, the appeal is dismissed as moot. See e.g. Tyler v. Peacock, 124 So. 463 (Fla. 1929); Voelz v. Obama, 134 So. 3d 1049 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).
MAKAR, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ Bruce Frederic Nathan, pro se, Appellant. Bradley R. McVay, Interim General Counsel, and Ashley E. Davis, Deputy General Counsel, Florida Department of State, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gill v. City OF N. Miami Beach, 156 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)…t.1 [*183] Accordingly, this appeal should'be and is ■dismissed on our own motion without prejudice to the right of the appellant to pursue such other action for relief as he may be .advised. Appeal dismissed. . See: Tyler v. Peacock, 98 Fla. 981, 124 So. 463; Barrs v. Peacock, 65 Fla. 12, 61 So. 118; Coursen v. City of South Daytona, Fla.App.1961, 127 So. 2d 905.…
-
Nathan v. Dep't of State, 265 So. 3d 656 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)…ounty. Karen Gievers, Judge. January 14, 2019 PER CURIAM. Upon consideration of Appellee’s suggestion of mootness, filed on December 5, 2018, and Appellant’s response thereto, the appeal is dismissed as moot. See e.g. Tyler v. Peacock, 124 So. 463 (Fla. 1929); Voelz v. Obama, 134 So. 3d 1049 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). MAKAR, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur. 2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.33…
-
Wells v. Cochrane, 137 Fla. 241 (Fla. 1939)…rt’s order refusing to restrain the holding of the election is now moot as the time therefor elapsed. See City of St. Petersburg v. Clark, 127 Fla. 232, 166 So. 563; Alabama Coal Co. v. Bowden, 44 Fla. 163, 31 So. 820; Tyler v. Peacock, 98 Fla. 981, 124 So. 463; Hogan v. State, ex rel. Williams, 86 Fla. 361, 98 So. 70; Yent v. State, ex rel. Richardson, 66 Fla. 336, 63 So. 452; McCormick v. Bond, 75 Fla. 819, 78 So. 681; Du-Bose v. Meister, 92 Fla. 995, 110 So. 546. It is contended that this Court should…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Tyler v. Peacock, 98 Fla. 981 (Fla. 1929)
- Nathan v. Dep't of State, 265 So. 3d 656 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)
- Voeltz v. Barack Hussein Obama, 134 So. 3d 1049 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)