LEAFY WAY ENTERPRISES, INC., DAVID S. KAUFMAN, GROVE VILLAGE PROPERTIES, INC., D/B/A GROVE PROPERTIES, APPELLANTS.
v.
CAROLYN JANE LAMB, APPELLEE
LEAFY WAY ENTERPRISES, INC., DAVID S. KAUFMAN, GROVE VILLAGE PROPERTIES, INC., D/B/A GROVE PROPERTIES, APPELLANTS.
CAROLYN JANE LAMB, APPELLEE
841 So. 2d 663
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Infinity Radio Inc. v. Whitby, 780 So. 2d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Gold Coast Chemical Corp. v. Goldberg, 668 So. 2d 326 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Perry & Co. v. First Sec. Ins. Underwriters, Inc., 654 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
C.D. v. State, 865 So. 2d 605 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…ency proceedings. While some of them are undisputedly clear, others leave room for interpretation. Previously, this court has found room to interpret the juvenile speedy trial rule. State v. V.M., 842 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); State v. D.L., 841 So. 2d 663 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); D.D. v. State, 817 So. 2d 930 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). By our opinion today, we recede from those cases and adhere to the plain language of Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.090(m). Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.030(a) pr…1 / 2
-
State v. V.M., 842 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…uv. P. 8.090(d),(m)(3). On April 19, 2002, a hearing was held on V.M.’s motion to dismiss. The trial court made no findings of fact and dismissed the charges against V.M. We hold this was error. As recently addressed by this court in State v. D.L., 841 So. 2d 663 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), a minor who is not arraigned prior to the expiration of speedy trial is not automatically entitled to dismissal of the charges. See also A.L. v. State, 787 So. 2d 942, 944 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(rejecting argument that failure to a…
-
State v. S.C., 865 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…or possession of a weapon on school property. The state asserts that the trial court erred in granting the dismissal because it was entitled to the ten-day window provided for in Florida [*685] Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.090. Citing State v. D.L., 841 So. 2d 663 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), appellee argues that the state is not entitled to the benefit of the recapture period because “the availability of the recapture period turns on whether the child’s inability to move for speedy trial discharge within a short tim…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Gold Coast Chem. Corp. v. Goldberg, 668 So. 2d 326 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
- Infinity Radio Inc. v. Whitby, 780 So. 2d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
- Perry & Co. & Equity Premium Fin. Co. v. First Sec. Ins. Underwriters, Inc., 654 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)