LEONARD BARNES, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Johnson v. Johnson, 847 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
  …. 2d 1079 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). . Artuso v. Dick, 843 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 4th DCA, Apr.9, 2003) (failure to make express findings regarding the amount and source of the income imputed to mother for child support purposes warranted reversal); Ice v. Ice, 842 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 1st DCA, Apr.8, 2003) (trial court erred in imputing a $25,000 salary to former wife). . § 61.16, Fla. Stat. (in determining whether to make attorney’s fees and costs awards at the appellate level, the court shall primarily consider the relat…
• Peacock v. Peacock, 879 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
  …ting a marital couple’s liabilities in a dissolution action requires the trial court to identify them. The second step requires the court to designate them as either marital or non-marital. The third step is to equitably distribute them. Ice v. Ice, 842 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). The general rule requires marital property to be distributed equally. Krafchuk v. Krafchuk, 804 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Nevertheless, “there can be unequal distribution if justifications for disparity exist.” Id. at 380…
• Elizabete Pinho McLEOD v. McLEOD, 915 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
  …and liabilities. The failure to identify the nature of all of the assets and liabilities and to establish a value for and distribute each marital asset and liability renders this court powerless to engage in meaningful appellate review. Ice v. Ice, 842 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); see also Burke v. Burke, 864 So. 2d 1284 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Gaetani-Slade v. Slade, 852 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Accordingly, we reverse the equitable distribution and remand to the trial court to make the findings as…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Cooke, 767 So. 2d 468 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)