JON C. RANDALL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Scrivener'S Error cases and more on FLexlaw
SILBERMAN, Judge.
Jon C. Randall challenges the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence. We affirm; however, we note that on the face of the record, a discrepancy exists between the oral pronouncement and the written sentence. The plea agreement and transcript indicate that Randall was convicted of two counts of attempted capital sexual battery, a first-degree felony. However, the judgment lists the offenses as two counts of attempted sexual battery, a second-degree felony. In the context of the entire plea and sentencing hearing, it appears that the discrepancy is the result of a scrivener’s error. Accordingly, the case is remanded for the trial court to correct the written sentencing documents to conform to the oral pronouncement. Williams v. State, 744 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Randall need not be present for the correction of the sentencing documents.
Affirmed with directions.
WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Republic Fed. Bank, N.A. v. Doyle, 19 So. 3d 1053 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…tem, and subordinated to “the primordial necessity of order in the social life.” Wide enough in all conscience is the field of discretion that remains. B. Cardozo, The Nature of the Judicial Process 141 (1921). See Storm v. Allied Universal Corp., 842 So. 2d 245, 246 n. 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (trial judge refused to preclude plaintiff, who misled and deceived the defendants, the jury and the trial court, from further litigation “to give the Plaintiff the break of his life”); Arango v. Arango, 450 So. 2d 583 (…
-
Cicoria v. Gazi, 901 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)…. Donian, 343 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). . § 668.50, Fla. Stat.; Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence (2004). See Tillman v. Smith, 472 So. 2d 1353 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). . Fla. Jur.2d, Judicial Sales, § 67. See Storm v. Allied Universal Corp., 842 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Snow v. Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, 896 So. 2d 787 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).…
-
Duran v. Lapin, 971 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)…AM. We affirm the order striking the appellant’s pleadings. Trial courts have discretion to strike a party’s pleadings or dismiss claims for fraud on the court. See Rios v. Moore, 902 So. 2d 181 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Storm v. Allied Universal Corp., 842 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); O'Vahey v. Miller, 644 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). The record before us does not support the appellant’s contention that the trial court abused its discretion in this regard. Affirmed.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Williams v. State, 744 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)