ROBERT STANLEY PLIMPTON, APPELLANT,

v.

OLD DIXIE STORAGE, INC., ET AL., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Cooper v. Gress, 854 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)
  …eplete with instances of the parties’ mutual failure to communicate effectively, the former wife failed to allege and prove an unanticipated substantial, material change in circumstances since the entry of the final judgment. See Chapman v. Prevatt, 845 So. 2d 976 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (finding that trial court abused its discretion in modifying custody to institute annual rotating-custody plan, where neither parent had sought rotational residential custody, no evidence was presented indicating that children we…
• Botterbusch v. Botterbusch, 851 So. 2d 903 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
  …rates: (1) a substantial or material change in the circumstances of the parties since the entry of the custody and visitation order; and (2) that the welfare of the child will be promoted by a change in custody and visitation.’ ” Chapman v. Prevatt, 845 So. 2d 976, 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (quoting Knipe v. Knipe, 840 So. 2d 335, 339-40 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)). A primary residential parent’s decision to relocate, “in the absence of other compelling circumstances, does not in and of itself support a change of cust…
• Segarra v. Segarra, 947 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
  …e in circumstances sufficient to warrant modification of the final judgment. We disagree. A desire to relocate alone, as a matter of law, is not a substantial change in circumstances sufficient to warrant modification of custody. Chapman v. Prevatt, 845 So. 2d 976, 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)(citing Perez v. Perez, 767 So. 2d 513, 517-18 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)). Moreover, we find that the parties’ failure to complete counseling does not, as a matter of law, constitute a substantial change in circumstances to support…