DANA CHARLES ANDREWS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DANA CHARLES ANDREWS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
846 So. 2d 1194
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Watson v. State, 842 So. 2d 275, 2003 WL 1877193 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); State v. Franklin, 836 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
BENTON, PADOVANO and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pure H20 Biotechnologies, Inc. v. Mazziotti, 937 So. 2d 242 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…ud on the court. Wescott v. Wescott, 444 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Neither of these types of fraud can be the basis of a motion to vacate which is filed more than one year after the judgment. Amer. Assocs., Ltd. v. WHUD Real Estate Ltd. P’ship, 846 So. 2d 1194, 1195 n. 2 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). The fraud took place during the proceedings, not after the judgment was entered, and therefore does not fall within the ambit of subsection (b)(5). We find that the Mazziottis’ claims of fraud were time barred, and t…
Authorities Cited
- Gende v. Fla. Dep't of Child. & Families, 836 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
- Gillis Watson v. State, 842 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)
- Perkins v. State, 842 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)