ALFREDO NARBONA, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION AND GARRISON PROTECTIVE SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC., APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Voluntary Departure From Employment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
As there is substantial, competent evidence to support the finding that the appellant voluntarily left his employment without good cause attributable to his employer when he remained away from work longer than his scheduled leave without informing his employer of his status, we affirm the order disqualifying him from receiving unemployment benefits. See e.g., Garcia v. AT & T Communications, Inc., 575 So. 2d 730, 731 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (affirming the finding that appellant was not entitled to unemployment benefits where she requested a six-month leave of absence and was informed that reemploy ment would be dependent on position availability; employee voluntarily left employment and did not have a position upon her return) (quoting Slusher v. State Dep’t of Commerce, 354 So. 2d 450, 451 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) (“Although the claimant’s reason for leaving may be considered a good personal reason, it cannot be considered attributable to the employer.”)). See also Kacsir v. State Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 456 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (reviewing court may not overturn hearing officer’s findings of fact which are supported by competent, substantial record evidence).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sanchez v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 861 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…ompetent evidence that the appellant’s voluntarily leaving her employment was not attributable to her employer. Accordingly, the decision of the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission is affirmed. See Narbona v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 851 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Affirmed.…
-
Cobo v. Walgreen Co. & Reemployment Assistance Appeals Comm'n, 104 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Narbona v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 851 So. 2d 226, 226 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (affirming order disqualifying claimant from receiving unemployment benefits where there was “substantial, competent evidence to support the finding that the [claimant] voluntarily left his employment without good cause attri…
Authorities Cited
- Slusher v. State, 354 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
- Taylor v. City Nat'l Bank, 575 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
- Kacsir v. State, 456 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)