TODD S. GRAY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Order Of Commitment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the commitment order entered under section 394.917(2), Florida Statutes (2001), the “Jimmy Ryce Act.” The only issue appellant raises is whether the court erred in not instructing the jury that the state had to prove that appellant has serious difficulty in controlling his dangerous behavior. We affirm based on Westerheide v. State, 831 So. 2d 93 (Fla.2002), but certify the same question certified as one of great public importance in Lee v. State, 854 So. 2d 709, 716, 2003 WL 21946444 (Fla. 2d DCA Aug.15, 2003), which is:
MAY AN INDIVIDUAL BE COMMITTED UNDER THE JIMMY RYCE ACT IN THE ABSENCE OF A JURY INSTRUCTION THAT THE STATE MUST PROVE THAT THE INDIVIDUAL HAS SERIOUS DIFFICULTY IN CONTROLLING HIS OR HER DANGEROUS BEHAVIOR?
GUNTHER and GROSS, JJ., concur. KLEIN, J., concurs specially with opinion.
KLEIN, J.,
concurring specially.
In Westerheide our supreme court construed Kansas v. Crane, 534 U.S. 407, 122 S.Ct. 867, 151 L.Ed.2d 856 (2002), in which the United States Supreme Court held that there must be proof of “serious difficulty” in controlling behavior. Westerheide, 831 So. 2d at 107. The Florida Supreme Court found no error in the jury instructions in Westerheide because it concluded that the jury instruction given was close enough to the proof necessary under Crane:
While the instruction does not use the words ‘serious difficulty’ in controlling behavior, it conveys this meaning. We accordingly find no constitutional infirmity in this instruction.
Westerheide, 831 So. 2d at 109.
It thus appears to me that although Westerheide does not require the serious difficulty in controlling behavior language, it actually supports the giving of such an instruction. Trial judges, in my opinion, would be well advised to give the instruction, even though Westerheide does not require it at the present time, because the United States Supreme Court has not yet addressed jury instructions in these cases. I don’t see how anyone could object to such an instruction, since it would be consistent with the burden of proof established in Crane, and it could obviate the need for a new trial if the United States Supreme Court ultimately holds that such an instruction is necessary.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. White, 891 So. 2d 502 (Fla. 2004)…such an instruction, since it would be consistent with the burden of proof established in Crane, and it could obviate the need for a new trial if the United States Supreme Court ultimately holds that such an instruction is necessary. Gray v. State, 854 So. 2d 287, 287-88 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (Klein, J. concurring specially). “The yardstick by which jury instructions are measured is clarity, for jurors must understand fully the law that they are expected to apply fairly.” Perriman v. State, 731 So. 2d 1243, 1…1 / 2
-
Collier v. State, 857 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…vior.” Although this question is mooted by our decision regarding the SVR-20, and not reached as a consequence, it is fair to note that this question is one which this Court has recently certified to be of great public importance. See Gray v. State, 854 So. 2d 287 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). REVERSED AND REMANDED for new trial. GUNTHER and GROSS, JJ, concur. KLEIN, J., concurs specially with opinion.…
-
Gentes v. State, 878 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…Fla. May 13, 2004); Murray v. Regier, 872 So. 2d 217 (Fla.2002). However, we certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified by our sister courts in Freeze v. State, 861 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), and Gray v. State, 854 So. 2d 287 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003): MAY AN INDIVIDUAL BE COMMITTED UNDER THE JIMMY RYCE ACT IN THE ABSENCE OF A JURY INSTRUCTION THAT THE STATE MUST PROVE THAT THE INDIVIDUAL HAS SERIOUS DIFFICULTY IN CONTROLLING HIS OR HER DANGEROUS BEHAVIOR? ERVIN and BOOTH,…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Westerheide v. State, 831 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 2002)
- Kansas v. Crane, 534 U.S. 407 (U.S. 2002)
- LEE v. State, 854 So. 2d 709 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)