DANIEL G. JONES, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See State v. Franklin, 836 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA)(en banc), review granted, Nos. SC03-413, 03-532, 854 So. 2d 659 (Fla. Sept.19, 2003). Conflict is certified with Taylor v. State, 818 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. dismissed, 821 So. 2d 302 (Fla.2002).
GREEN, J.
(specially concurring).
The doctrine of stare decisis compels me to join in the affirmance of this cause, but I continue to adhere to the view that Taylor v. State, 818 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 821 So. 2d 302 (Fla.2002), was correct in its conclusion that Chapter Law 99-188, Laws of Florida, violates the single subject rule of the Florida Constitution.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
Dany Gilbert v. Eckerd Corp. OF Fla., Inc., 34 So. 3d 773 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…cretion standard. Cherubino v. Fenstersheib & Fox, P.A., 925 So. 2d 1066, 1068 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). “Such sanction may be imposed only on a ‘clear showing of fraud, pretense, collusion, or similar wrongdoing.’ ” Bob Montgomery Real Estate v. Djokic, 858 So. 2d 371, 374 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (quoting Tri Star Invs., Inc. v. Miele, 407 So. 2d 292, 293 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)). In other words, the extreme sanction of dismissal should be imposed only where “it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party…
-
Chacha v. Transp. USA, Inc., 78 So. 3d 727 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)…, 706 So. 2d 43, 46 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)). “A dismissal for fraud on the court is reviewed under a narrowed abuse of discretion standard.” Gilbert v. Eckerd Corp. of Fla., 34 So. 3d 773, 775 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); Bob Montgomery Real Estate v. Djokic, 858 So. 2d 371, 374 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (“Although a dismissal imposed as a sanction is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard, the trial court’s discretion is narrowed where dismissal is imposed for fraudulent conduct such as that alleged here, in which a…
-
Cherubino v. Fenstersheib & FOX, P.A., 925 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…osed only on a “clear showing of fraud, pretense, collusion, or similar wrongdoing.” Tri Star Inv. v. Miele, 407 So. 2d 292, 293 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); see also Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 46 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). Bob Montgomery Real Estate v. Djokic, 858 So. 2d 371, 374 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Trial courts have “the right and obligation to deter fraudulent claims from proceeding in court.” Savino v. Fla. Drive In Theatre Mgmt., Inc., 697 So. 2d 1011, 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). This is because “[o]ur courts have o…
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Taylor v. State, 818 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
- Gende v. Fla. Dep't of Child. & Families, 836 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)