FELIX ZAMORA, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Radford v. Brock, 914 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
  …1997). “When a trial court receives a petition for a writ of mandamus, its initial task is assessing the petition to determine whether it is facially sufficient. If it is not facially sufficient, the court may dismiss the petition.” Davis v. State, 861 So. 2d 1214, 1215 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (citations [*1068] omitted). If the petition is facially sufficient, the court must issue an alternative writ of mandamus requiring the-respondent to show cause why the writ should not be issued. Moore v. Ake, 693 So. 2d 697…
• Watkins v. State, 159 So. 3d 323 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
  …961 So. 2d 1044, 1044 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (“Once the Office of the Public Defender’s representation of an indigent defendant ends, the office must, upon request, surrender any trial transcripts in its possession to the defendant.”); Davis v. State, 861 So. 2d 1214, 1216 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (“The law is clear that an indigent defendant is entitled to his criminal trial transcripts, including depositions, prepared at public expense .... ”). We note also that the confidential identifying information of a person w…
• Williams v. State, 189 So. 3d 909 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
  …[*910] “When a trial court receives a petition for a writ of mandamus, its initial task is assessing the petition to determine whether it is facially sufficient. If it is not facially sufficient, the court may dismiss the petition.” Davis v. State, 861 So. 2d 1214, 1215 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (citations omitted). The court correctly dismissed Mr. Williams’ petition as facially insufficient because he did not acknowledge his obligation to pay for copying costs. Cf. Farmer v. State, 927 So. 2d 1075, 1076 (Fla. 2d D…