ALEX O. MICHEL, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ALEX O. MICHEL, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
862 So. 2d 943
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of State v. Franklin, 836 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review granted, 854 So. 2d 659 (Fla.2003). Conflict is certified with Taylor v. State, 818 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), rev. dismissed, 821 So. 2d 302 (Fla.2002).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gray v. State, 868 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)…. 2d DCA 2003); Fla. R.Crim P. 3.850(b)(4). Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Gray may have to file a facially sufficient motion within sixty [*634] days from the date of the issuance of the mandate in this case. See Burgess v. State, 862 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Affirmed. WHATLEY and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Taylor v. State, 818 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
- Gende v. Fla. Dep't of Child. & Families, 836 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)