JEROME L. ADAMS, APPELLANT,

v.

BRIAN J. STROBL, D/B/A CASEWORK SPECIALIST, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Superior Garlic Int'l v. E & A Produce Corp., 913 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
  …as to 1) civil theft, 2) conversion, and 3) malicious destruction of property. Because there were no other claims remaining against Olmo, summary judgment was entered in her favor, which was later affirmed on appeal. See E & A Produce Corp. v. Olmo, 864 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). E & A proceeded on its claim for negligence, and Trujillo and Superior proceeded on their counterclaims for wrongful eviction, and storage charges. The jury returned verdicts in favor of E & A on its negligence claims against Su…
• Superior Garlic Int'l, Inc. v. E & A Produce Corp., 934 So. 2d 484 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)
  …v. Superior Garlic Int’l, Inc., 864 So. 2d 449, 450 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). However, that is immaterial for our purposes. . Olmo had been successful in removing herself from the controversy on a summary judgment motion. See E & A Produce Corp. v. Olmo, 864 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). .The successor trial judge, Judge Robert Pi-neiro, although not included as a respondent in the caption of the petition, is a "formal party to the petition for mandamus.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.100(e).…
• Ghannam v. Mark D. Shelnutt, P.A., 199 So. 3d 295 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)
  …ration. See Trans Health Mgmt. Inc. v. Nunziata, 159 So. 3d 850, 858 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). There is nothing in the record on appeal that supports an award of fees incurred by the corporation against Ghannam personally. See E & A Produce Corp. v. Olmo, 864 So. 2d 447, 448 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (“Officers of a corporation are not liable for corporate acts simply by reason of the officer’s relation to the corporation.” (citing Checkers Drive-In Rests., Inc. v. Tampa Checkmate Food Servs., Inc., 805 So. 2d 941, 944 (F…

Authorities Cited

• Johnson v. Allstate Ins. Co., 410 So. 2d 978 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
• HZJ, Inc. v. Wysocki, 511 So. 2d 1088 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)