LONNIE W. JACOBS, III, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2004-01-21
No. 1D03-4548
ALLEN, WEBSTER and BENTON, JJ., concur.
864 So. 2d 563 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Pitts v. State, 855 So. 2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); State v. Franklin, 836 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). We certify conflict with Taylor v. State, 818 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 821 So. 2d 302 (Fla.2002).

ALLEN, WEBSTER and BENTON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • HIS Kids Daycare v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 904 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
    …age credits. In doing so, the UAC erred. BURDEN OF PROOF AND “INSURED” WORK A claimant has the burden to prove he or she has met the statutory eligibility requirements for unemployment compensation. See Morales v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 864 So. 2d 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Lewis v. Lakeland Health Care Ctr., Inc., 685 So. 2d 876 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). To be eligible for benefits, a claimant must have been paid wages for “insured” work, which is defined as “employment for employers.” See §§ 443.036(27)…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw