TOWN OF BRADLEY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
J. H. KIRKLAND, ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR

Fla. | 1933-05-13
Whitfield, P. J., and BrowN and Buford, J. J., concur., Davis, C. J., and Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
110 Fla. 239 Florida Supreme Court (1933) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 148 So. 540
Cited by 14 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decree ousting a municipality from exercising jurisdiction over certain lands. The court found substantial evidence supported the decree, adhering to its rule that such decrees should not be reversed when supported by evidence.


Holding

Yes, the evidence was sufficient to support the final decree. Therefore, the decree should not be reversed.


Key Quotes

“We find in the record substantial evidence to support the decree and, therefore, under the oft-repeated rule enunciated by this Court, the decree of the chancellor should not be reversed.”

Establishes the court's reasoning for affirming the lower court's decision.

Facts & Procedural History

The case involved a municipality's claim of jurisdiction over specific lands. A prior appeal had been before the court. The current appeal concerned t…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This- case was heretofore before us and opinion was filed March 2, 1932. See 139 Sou. 144. It is now before us on final decree ousting the municipality from exercising jurisdiction and municipal powers over certain lands described in the petition.

The only question before us now for our consideration is whether or not the evidence was sufficient to constitute a basis for the final decree. We find in the record substantial evidence to support the decree and, therefore, under the oft-repeated rule enunciated by this Court, the decree of the chancellor should not be reversed. The law as apparently applied in this case by the chancellor has recently been enunciated by this Court in the opinion on the case of State ex rel. Davis, Town of Lake Placid, filed at this term of the Court. See 92 Fla. 863, 110 So. 460.

The decree should'be affirmed and it is s'o ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and BrowN and Buford, J. J., concur.

Davis, C. J., and Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Deeb v. State, 131 Fla. 362 (Fla. 1937)
    …iff in error was indicted by the grand jury of Escambia County, Florida, June 14, 1933, for murder in the first degree alleged to have been committed in Escambia County, Florida, April 19, 1933. Accused was allowed bail. Deeb v. Gandy, 110 Fla. 283, 148 So. 540. For further proceedings relative to the custody of the accused, see State, ex rel., Deeb, v. Fabisinski, Judge, 111 Fla. 454, 152 So. 207; State, ex rel. Deeb, v. Campbell, 123 Fla. 894, 167 So. 805. When the accused was brought into the Circuit C…
  • State v. Campbell, 123 Fla. 894 (Fla. 1935)
    …Davis, J. Petitioner’s ward, George J. Deeb, was arrested and committed to the County Jail of Escambia County on the charge of murder and thereafter released on bond to await the action of the Grand Jury. See: Deeb v. Gandy, 110 Fla. 283, 148 Sou. Rep. 540. While at large on bail, and prior to the convening of the Escambia County Grand Jury, Deeb was haled before the County Judge of Leon County in statutory insanity proceedings (Sections 3654-3657 C. G. L., 2308-2311 R. G. S.), adjudged insane therein…
  • State of Fla. ex rel. Mary Freeman v. Kelly, 86 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 1956)
    …nk there is a clear showing that appellant was guilty of the degree of homicide for which she was charged. State ex rel. Young v. Kelly, Fla., 66 So. 2d 252; State ex rel. Connor v. Sullivan, 160 Fla. 844, 36 So. 2d 828; Deeb v. Gandy, 110 Fla. 283, 148 So. 540; Russell v. State, 71 Fla. 236, 71 So. 27; Mayo v. State, Fla., 71 So. 2d 899. The last cited case is apposite because we there held that defendant’s version of the homicide can not be ignored where there is absence of other evidence legally suffic…

Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw