DORSETT JAMES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2004-03-18
No. 1D03-5502
WOLF, C.J., ERVIN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
868 So. 2d 1225 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. See Pitts v. State, 855 So. 2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); State v. Franklin, 836 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review granted, 854 So. 2d 659 (Fla.2003). We certify conflict with Taylor v. State, 818 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 821 So. 2d 302 (Fla.2002).

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, C.J., ERVIN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Roebuck v. Sills, 306 So. 3d 374 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020)
  • Quintana v. People's Tr. Ins. Co. (Fla. 4th DCA 2022)
    …dismiss where allegations supporting the affirmative defense did not appear within the four corners of the insureds’ complaint. Applying de novo review, we agree with the insureds’ argument, and therefore reverse. See Underwood v. Columbia County, 868 So. 2d 1225, 1227 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (“Because … these issues are pure questions of law, the de novo standard of review applies, and we may therefore review the issues despite the absence of a full record on appeal.”); see also Horton v. Freeman, 917 So. 2d 10…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw