MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
CLARA FLORES, APPELLEE
MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY, APPELLANT,
CLARA FLORES, APPELLEE
870 So. 2d 127
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment finding that the alleged error, if any, in the admission of the evidence was entirely harmless. See Soler v. Kukula, 297 So. 2d 600, 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Hall v. Haldane, 268 So. 2d 403, 404-05 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mercury Cas. Co. v. Flores, 905 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…lee Clara Flores sued her insurance company, defendant-appellant Mercury Casualty Company, seeking uninsured motorist benefits. The plaintiff obtained judgment in her favor, which was affirmed by this court on appeal. Mercury Casualty Co. v. Flores, 870 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). By unpublished order that panel granted appellate attorney’s fees and remanded to the trial court to determine the amount. On remand, the trial court determined the amount of appellate attorney’s fees to be awarded to the plainti…
-
Burgess Transp., Inc. v. Arostegui, 882 So. 2d 411 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)…l court’s evidentiary rulings were within the court’s discretion. See State v. Nieto, 761 So. 2d 467, 468 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Assuming any error on the evidentiary issues, we conclude that they were entirely harmless. See Mercury Cas. Co. v. Flores, 870 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). The trial court’s rulings regarding the accident report privilege were correct. See Alexander v. Penske Logistics, Inc., 867 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). There was no fundamental error relating to the unobjected-to portions o…
Authorities Cited
- Soler v. Kukula, 297 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
- Est. of William R. Dean v. Saint Aircraft, Inc., 268 So. 2d 403 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972)
- Novak v. State, 268 So. 2d 403 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)