GEORGE JAMES NOVAK, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1972-11-14
No. 71-1258
Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
268 So. 2d 403 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1972) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State ex rel. Hanks v. Goodman, Fla.1971, 253 So.2d 129, and as to an additional point see Murphy v. State, Fla.App.1971, 252 So.2d 261.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hughes v. Canal Ins. Co., 308 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
    …ony in the record upon which the jury could find that the appellees’ vehicle was not negligently operated. See, Sea Crest Corporation v. Burley, Fla.1949, 38 So. 2d 434; Riley v. Jackson, Fla.App. 1971, 246 So. 2d 625; Hall v. Haldane, Fla.App.1972, 268 So. 2d 403. Therefore, for the reasons stated and upon the authority cited, the judgment appealed is affirmed. Affirmed. CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge, dissents.…
  • Mercury Cas. Co. v. Flores, 870 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
    …PER CURIAM. We affirm the judgment finding that the alleged error, if any, in the admission of the evidence was entirely harmless. See Soler v. Kukula, 297 So. 2d 600, 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Hall v. Haldane, 268 So. 2d 403, 404-05 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw