ETHEL THOMPSON SWEITZER, PETITIONER,
v.
DAWN M. THOMAS, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 2004-03-25
No. SC03-165
ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
870 So. 2d 791 Florida Supreme Court (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Sweitzer v. Thomas, 834 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), a decision alleged to be in express and direct conflict with Loring v. Winters, 802 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have now determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • A.F.L., JR. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 927 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
    …arch of the Putative Father Registry and that his tardy registration was ineffective to preserve his claim. We affirm. The Putative Father Registry became effective on May 30, 2003. See Amendments to Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms, 870 So. 2d 791, 792 (Fla.2004). The purpose behind the registry is set out under section 63.053. That section provides: (1) In enacting the provisions contained in this chapter, the Legislature prescribes the conditions for determining whether an unmarried biolog…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw