S. BRADFORD BROWN, III, APPELLANT,
v.
DOUGLAS M. GUETZLOE & STACEY M. GUETZLOE, APPELLEES
S. BRADFORD BROWN, III, APPELLANT,
DOUGLAS M. GUETZLOE & STACEY M. GUETZLOE, APPELLEES
802 So. 2d 335
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, C.J.
See Morand v. Stoneburner, 516 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987) (holding that where appellant appeals amended final judgment that only addressed fees and costs, yet seeks to appeal merits of final judgment that was entered more than 30 days prior to notice of appeal, appellate court is without jurisdiction to hear appeal).
GRIFFIN, J., and ORFINGER, M., Senior Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smiley v. Nelson, 805 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…Accordingly, we hold that noneconomic damages, including those for disability, physical impairment, and loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life, are not available under the no-fault law absent a finding of permanent injury. See Loring v. Winters, 802 So. 2d 335, (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (holding that section 627.737 plainly intends to exempt owners, registrants, operators, or occupants from tort liability for all noneco-nomic damages except those damages “for pain, suffering, mental anguish, and inconvenience fo…
-
Sweitzer v. Thomas, 834 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…specifically referenced in section 627.737(2). At the time of the trial in May, 2001, the trial court did not have the guidance of subsequently published decisions of other district courts addressing this issue, including, e.g., Loving v. Winters, 802 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), Gill v. McGuire, 806 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), and Giles v. Luckie, 816 So. 2d 248 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Those decisions hold that an injured plaintiff must satisfy the threshold requirements of • section 627.737(2) in order…
-
Sweitzer v. Thomas, 870 So. 2d 791 (Fla. 2004)…PER CURIAM. We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Sweitzer v. Thomas, 834 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), a decision alleged to be in express and direct conflict with Loring v. Winters, 802 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have now determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed. It is so ordered.…
Authorities Cited
- Charles Morand, M.D. v. Stoneburner, 516 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)
- Cont'l Ins. Co. v. Nunez, 516 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)