STEVE T. MALU, APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF GAINESVILLE, APPELLEE
STEVE T. MALU, APPELLANT,
CITY OF GAINESVILLE, APPELLEE
872 So. 2d 445
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004)
Caution
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellant’s responses to the Court’s orders of February 18, 2004, and March 24, 2004, the Court has determined that the order is not final because, although the order grants a motion for summary judgment, it fails to enter judgment. C.f McQuaig v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 789 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). A determination that “final judgment shall be entered,” is insufficient to unequivocally demonstrate finality. Id. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
BARFIELD, DAVIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nichols v. State, 927 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)…the Legislature sought to make clear that, henceforth, the sudden snatching of property by no more force than is necessary to remove the property from a person who does not resist would amount to a species of robbery in Florida. See State v. Floyd, 872 So. 2d 445, 446 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 848 So. 2d 361, 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Owens v. State, 787 So. 2d 143, 143-44 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). See also Fla. H.R. Comm, on Jud., HB 425 (1999) Staff Analysis (Final June 23, 1999). We cannot distin…
-
Wess v. State, 67 So. 3d 1133 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)…m who is conscious of the startling seizure of something from her hand or person.” Id. Because the purse in Brown “was not on the victim’s person,” the court reversed the appellant’s conviction of robbery by sudden snatching. Id. In State v. Floyd, 872 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), the victim testified that she was sitting in her car with an acquaintance, talking and smoking a cigarette. Id. at 446. As the acquaintance “left the car, he grabbed the victim’s purse, which she said was sitting on the car seat…
-
State v. Brown, 29 So. 3d 437 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)…on consideration of the appellant’s responses to the Court’s orders of October 20, 2009, and January 12, 2010, the Court has determined that the Order Granting Motion to Apply Credit is not a final ap-pealable order. See Malu v. City of Gainesville, 872 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (holding that order granting motion for summary judgment and determining that “final judgment shall be entered” is insufficient to demonstrate an unequivocal completion of the lower tribunal’s judicial labor). Accordingly, the ap…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- McQUAIG v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 789 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)