JAMES JONES, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Fcci Ins. Co. v. Horne, 890 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)
  …9 (Fla. 2004).] . See Appendix. . FCCI was defending Scarborough in both actions under a reservation of rights. . The standard of review for the interpretation of an insurance contract is de novo. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Parrish, 873 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Paladyne Corp. v. Weindruch, 867 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). The standard of review for summary judgments is also de novo. Kaplan v. Morse, 870 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Mivan (Florida), Inc. v. Metric Con [*1143] stru…
• Melania Cheetham and Charlie Cheetham v. S. OAK Ins. Co., 114 So. 3d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)
  …is de novo.”); see also Fayad v. Clarendon Nat’l Ins. Co., 899 So. 2d 1082, 1085 (Fla. 2005) (holding that whether specific damage “comes within the scope of the exclusionary clause is a question of law”); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Parrish, 873 So. 2d 547, 549 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (“When the interpretation of an insurance contract is in question, the applicable standard of review is de novo.”); Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Weiss, 790 So. 2d 475, 476 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (holding that when the cause of loss…
• O'Brien v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 999 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
  …e affirm. I. We review de novo a final summary judgment rejecting a claim of uninsured motorist coverage. See State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Shaw, 967 So. 2d 1011, 1014 n. 2 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (citing State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Parrish, 873 So. 2d 547, 549 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)). The sole issue before us is the legal question whether appellant’s rejection of uninsured motorist coverage under an umbrella policy in 1992 precluded recovery under the policy on account of his daughter’s death in a 2004…

Authorities Cited

• Woods v. State, 542 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)