GLENN SMITH, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals the trial court’s denial of his complaint for declaratory judgment challenging the constitutionality of the term “disorderly conduct” contained in Fla. Admin. Code R. 33-601.314, § 9-17. We affirm the trial court’s ruling because the term is not vague or overbroad. See Smith v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 799 So. 2d 319, 319 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (holding that the prohibition against fighting in Fla. Admin. Code R. 33-601.314, § 2-4 was not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad); D.L.B. v. State, 707 So. 2d 844, 845 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (holding that statute prohibiting “affray” was not impermissibly vague because ordinary people could understand the meaning of “affray”).
AFFIRMED.
BOOTH, POLSTON and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Commercial Cap. Res., LLC v. Giovannetti, 955 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)…contractual terms is a question of law, which we review de novo, “provided that the language is clear and unambiguous and free of conflicting inferences.” Miller v. Kase, 789 So. 2d 1095, 1097 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); see also Gray v. D & J Indus. Inc., 875 So. 2d 683, 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)(“The construction of a contract is a question of law for the courts to determine where the language used in the written contract is clear, unambiguous, and susceptible to only one interpretation.”). Where the contractual lang…
-
Gulliver Schs., Inc. v. Snay, 137 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)…age of the parties’ agreement and Snay’s testimony confirming his breach of its terms, we reverse the order entered below granting the Snays’ motion to enforce the agreement. Reversed. . Our standard of review is de novo. Gray v, D &J Indus. Inc., 875 So. 2d 683, 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (“The construction of a contract is a question of law for the courts to determine where the language used in the written contract is clear, unambiguous, and susceptible of only one interpretation.”); see also Abel Homes at Na…
-
Ira D. Giller v. Cafeteria OF S. Beach Ltd., LLP, 967 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)…t a party hereto” or “other person” under the terms of the agreement. We disagree. We find that the contract plainly and unambiguously includes Mr. Giller among those who can demand arbitration under the terms of the agreement. Gray v. D & J Indus., 875 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)(“The construction of a contract is a question of law for the courts to determine wheré the language used in the written contract is clear, unambiguous, and susceptible of only one interpretation.”). Second, we reject Cafeteria’s…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- D.L.B. v. State, 707 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)
- Claudette Bell v. Fla. State Univ. & Fla. Dep't of Ins., 799 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
- Smith v. Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 799 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)