BRYAN A. KOCH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Oral Pronouncement cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We affirm, but remand in order that a written order memorializing the revocation can be entered. See Oliver v. State, 819 So. 2d 816, 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (affirming appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence, but because no order revoking appellant’s probation had been entered, remanding for entry of written order consistent with the trial court’s oral pronouncement); Walker v. State, 686 So. 2d 758, 758-59 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (affirming and remanding for the trial court “to enter a written order, consistent with its oral pronouncement, revoking appellant’s probation”); Clark v. State, 510 So. 2d 1202, 1204 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) (“While we find no reversible error in the trial court’s oral findings, we remand for the entry of a written order conforming to the oral pronouncements.”).
Affirmed; remanded with instructions.
ALLEN, DAVIS, and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
Shands Teaching Hosp. & Clinics, Inc. v. The Est. OF Ashley Lawson, 175 So. 3d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)…resents evidence by affidavit or evidentiary hearing.” Id. This approach best achieves the intended legislative goal of the pre-suit process, which is similar to jurisdictional and standing disputes, see Chuck v. City of Homestead Police Department, 888 So. 2d 736, 751 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (en banc) (requiring evidentiary hearing on “the issue of standing” and adopting the procedure set forth in Venetian Salami), the point being that by adjudicating disputes at the start of a lawsuit, overall litigation costs a…
-
Evaristo Beltran and Grisel Beltran v. Kalb, 982 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…(holding that procedural due process guarantees right to be heard in a meaningful manner); McDaniel v. McElvy, 91 Fla. 770, 108 So. 820 (1926)(same); Hinton v. Gold, 813 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)(same); Chuck v. City of Homestead Police Dept., 888 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)(same). See also Coy v. Mango Bay Prop. & Invs., Inc., 963 So. 2d 873, 878 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)(“court’s refusal to decide the homestead issue is reversible error”). On the record before us, we must conclude that the trial court sho…
-
Sanchez v. City OF W. Palm Beach, 149 So. 3d 92 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)…92-54, §§ 1, 3, [*97] Laws of Fla. Consistent with due process, a person falling within this enumerated category “has the right to litigate the issue of probable cause at an adversarial preliminary hearing.” Chuck v. City of Homestead Police Dep’t, 888 So. 2d 736, 745 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (emphasis added). With regard to the evidence to be presented at the hearing, section 932.703(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2013), provides: When an adversarial preliminary hearing is held, the court shall review the verified aff…
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Clark v. State, 510 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)
- Patterson v. State, 686 So. 2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
- Oliver v. State, 819 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)