STEVEN WAYNE DEFONTES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
STEVEN WAYNE DEFONTES, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
889 So. 2d 217
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s adjudications and sentences without prejudice to file a rule 3.850 motion. Because the trial court failed to enter a written order of revocation of probation specifying the conditions appellant violated, we remand to the trial court to reduce its findings of the revocation of probation to writing. See Riley v. State, 884 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Campbell v. State, 776 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ira C. King, III v. State, 46 So. 3d 1171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…rect. If a trial court revokes a defendant’s probation, the court is required to render a written order noting the specific conditions of probation that were violated. See Delisa v. State, 910 So. 2d 418, 421 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Defontes v. State, 889 So. 2d 217, 217 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Anderson v. State, 879 So. 2d 688, 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Campbell v. State, 776 So. 2d 1036, 1037 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Because the order of revocation of probation here does not specify the conditions defendant violated,…
-
Delisa v. State, 910 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…erred by not entering an order enumerating the conditions of probation Delisa violated, we note that a written order revoking probation and specifying the conditions violated is necessary for finding a violation of probation. See Defontes v. State, 889 So. 2d 217, 217 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Riley v. State, 884 So. 2d 1038, 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). Here, no such written order was entered. In conclusion, we reverse and remand with instructions for the lower court to appoint experts to evaluate Delisa’s compete…
Authorities Cited
- Riley v. State, 884 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
- Campbell v. State, 776 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)