STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, APPELLANT,
v.
DAVID P. WARRINER, ET AL., APPELLEE
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, APPELLANT,
DAVID P. WARRINER, ET AL., APPELLEE
893 So. 2d 608
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
WOLF, C.J.
Appellant, State of Florida, Department of Transportation (DOT), challenges an order awarding attorney’s fees. DOT asserts that the trial court erred in regard to its determination of entitlement to fees as well as the amount awarded. We find no error as to the trial court’s determination as to entitlement. We decline to address DOT’s issue concerning lack of notice prior to the court determining the amount of fees, 'as this issue was never presented to the trial court. The attorney’s fee award is affirmed.
KAHN and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
PPI, Inc. v. Fla. Dep't OF Bus. & Prof'l Reg., 917 So. 2d 1020 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)…e the right to file a motion to intervene in the declaratory statement action, make their arguments for lack of jurisdiction and if unsuccessful, raise the issue on appeal. See National Ass’n of Optometrists and Opticians v. Florida Dep’t of Health, 893 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Although prohibition will lie to prevent an inferior tribunal from acting in excess of jurisdiction, it generally will not lie to prevent an erroneous exercise of jurisdiction. See English v. McCrary, 348 So. 2d 293 (Fla.1977) (…