FREDDIE WILSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2005-01-18
No. 5D04-4159
SHARP, W., GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ., concur.
894 So. 2d 1030 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Turner v. Dugger, 614 So. 2d 1075 (Fla.1992); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b).

SHARP, W., GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Diwakar v. Montecito Palm Beach Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 143 So. 3d 958 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
    …e award was erroneous in the absence of testimony from a fees expert plus the attorney who performed the work, the argument was waived when Diwakar failed to object at trial. See DM Records, Inc. v. Turnpike Commercial Plaza, Phase II, Condo. Ass’n, 894 So. 2d 1030, 1031 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (finding the requirement that counsel performing the work testify was waived where attorney’s affidavit was admitted, an expert testified based on it, and there was no objection); Simhoni v. Chambliss, 843 [*961] So. 2d 103…
  • Phynerrian Q. Manning v. Tunnell, 943 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
    …er state’s laches defense, raised for the first time on appeal). Although there are exceptions to this rule, the exceptions are not applicable in the instant case. See DM Records, Inc. v. Turnpike Commercial Plaza, Phase II, Condominium Ass’n, Inc., 894 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)(explaining that sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment may be raised for the first time on appeal in a non-jury trial); Romage v. State, 890 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)(holding that claims based on an alleged viol…
  • Klein v. Roman, 226 So. 3d 955 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)
    …ee award was erroneous in the absence of testimony from a fees expert plus the attorney who performed the work, the argument was waived when Diwakar failed to object at trial.”); DM Records, Inc. v. Turnpike Commercial Plaza, Phase II, Condo. Ass’n, 894 So. 2d 1030, 1031 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (“If we were to allow these issues to be raised for the first time on appeal, where there was no objection in trial court, it would be unfair to the party seeking fees and the trial judge and result in unnecessary appeals.”…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw