SILVIO F. REYES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
SILVIO F. REYES, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
899 So. 2d 1269
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Brown v. State, 813 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).
PETERSON, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fla. Dep't OF Agric. & Consumer Servs. & The Fla. Comm'r of Agric. v. Mendez, 98 So. 3d 604 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)…onstitutional challenges to a board’s licensing and testing procedures were not ripe for review “in the absence of an actual controversy between the parties,” as “the Board has neither tested appellant nor denied him a license”); cf. State v. Higby, 899 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (after reversing the dismissal of criminal charges on a facial constitutional challenge, noting that any as-applied challenge would depend on the particular facts developed below); Shands v. City of Marathon, 999 So. 2d 718, 725 (…
-
State v. Green, 902 So. 2d 352 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)…fford Lavond Green’s motion to dismiss the charge of failure to return leased equipment in violation of section 812.155, Florida Statutes (2002). We reverse and remand for further proceedings in accordance with our recent decision in State v. Higby, 899 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (holding that trial court erred by identifying section 812.155(4)(b) as mandatory presumption when it is permissive inference). See also State v. Rygwelski, 899 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). ALTENBERND, C.J., and WHATLEY and La…
Authorities Cited
- Brown v. State, 813 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)