AMANDA J. SUGGS, AMBER SUGGS, AND DEBORAH SUGGS, APPELLANTS,

v.

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND STATE OF FLORIDA, LAND AND WATER ADJUDICATORY COMMISSION, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Contreras, 979 So. 2d 896 (Fla. 2008)
  …t likely to be testimonial. See, e.g., People v. Vigil, 127 P. 3d 916, 927-28 (Colo.2006) (holding that an excited utterance a child made to his father and his father’s friend immediately after a sexual assault was not testimonial); Mencos v. State, 909 So. 2d 349, 351 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (concluding that child victim’s statements to her mother that were overheard by a police detective were not testimonial and thus did not violate the Confrontation Clause); Herrera-Vega v. State, 888 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 5th DCA 2…
• Dawson v. State, 951 So. 2d 931 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
  …ment was admissible as a verbal act. See Decile v. State, 516 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Although Dawson also complains of a Confrontation Clause violation, he did not make that objection below. Therefore, it is not preserved. Mencos v. State, 909 So. 2d 349, 351 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). We do, however, reverse as to Dawson’s sentence. The court imposed a habitual offender sentence of forty years for possession of cocaine within 1000 feet of a church and five years for possession of cocaine to run consecut…
• Mencos v. State, 909 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
  …REHEARING We deny appellants motion for rehearing, but write to discuss one issue raised therein. In our original opinion, we indicated that Meneos did not preserve his Crawford1 objection for appellate review. See Mencos v. State, No. 4D03-4003, 909 So. 2d 349, 2005 WL 1680166 (Fla. 4th DCA July 20, 2005). As Meneos points out, he could not have specifically objected based on Crawford because the Supreme Court issued its ruling after Meneos trial. Nev [*352] ertheless, as Justice Scalia discussed, argumen…

Authorities Cited

• Env't Res. Assocs. OF Fla., Inc. v. State, 624 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)