SHARON MCCANTS-COLLIE, APPELLANT,
v.
ABE CHRISTOPHER COLLIE, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court erred in calculating child support based on an incorrect income figure for the husband due to a typographical error on the worksheet.
The husband's gross monthly income was listed as $5,577.00 in his financial affidavit and the Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. However, the …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Child Support Guidelines Worksheet cases and more on FLexlaw
SHAHOOD, J.
Appellant, Sharon McCants-Collie, appeals the Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage raising as her sole issue on appeal that the trial court erred in calculating child support because the support obligations were based on an incorrect income figure for the husband. We agree and reverse and remand for a new hearing to recalculate child support.
In his financial affidavit, the husband listed his occupation as a training manager with Technical Communications Corp. and a monthly gross income of $4,694.45, which was later increased to $5,577.00. In the Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage, the trial court found the husband’s gross monthly income to be $5,577. The child support guidelines worksheet, however, reflects a gross income for the husband in the amount of $557 and the child support obligations are based on that figure.
The error appears to be apparent on the face of the worksheet — $5,577 versus $577. The husband has not filed a brief in this appeal and we find nothing in the record to suggest that this was anything other than a typographical error which requires correction. We accordingly reverse and remand for a new hearing to recalculate child support based on the trial court’s findings.
Reversed and Remanded.
STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bell v. Broch, 230 So. 3d 1252 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)…er v. Kanter, 850 So. 2d 682, 684 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (“[A]n appellate court may reverse an order or judgment even in the absence of an adequate record where such order or judgment is fundamentally erroneous on its face.”); McCants-Collie v. Collie, 909 So. 2d 360, 360-61 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (reversing error apparent on the face of the record in calculating child support). The trial court’s award of $1,941 per month in child support to the husband is error on the face of the judgment because it is in conflic…
-
Rosenblum v. Anne R. Rosenblum (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)