THOMAS F. ROSENBLUM, FORMER HUSBAND
v.
ANNE R. ROSENBLUM, N/K/A ANNE R. MOORE, FORMER WIFE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's finding that the former husband's monthly income was $7,997 is affirmed, but the case is remanded to correct the child support guidelines worksheet to reflect this income figure.
[1] A discrepancy between a trial court's stated income finding in a child support order and the income figure listed on the attached child support guidelines worksheet may b…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Because it is clear from the language in the order that the trial court rejected Appellant's testimony that his monthly income was approximately $3,300 and accepted Appellee's evidence that his monthly income was $7,997, we affirm the order on appeal but remand with directions that the trial court attach to its order the worksheet reflecting Appellant's correct monthly income and child support obligation.”
Court's explanation of its decision to affirm the income finding while remanding to correct the worksheet
In a child support modification proceeding, the former husband testified his monthly income was approximately $3,300, while the former wife presented …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Child Support Guidelines Worksheet cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D18-2340 _____________________________
THOMAS F. ROSENBLUM, Former Husband,
Appellant,
v.
ANNE R. ROSENBLUM, n/k/a ANNE R. MOORE, Former Wife,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.
W. Gregg McCaulie, Judge.
June 28, 2019
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Thomas F. Rosenblum, appeals the trial court’s Order on Former Husband’s Supplemental Petitions and Pending Motions and raises three issues on appeal, only one of which merits discussion. Appellant argues, and Appellee, Anne R. Rosenblum, n/k/a Anne R. Moore, concedes, that the trial court’s finding as to Appellant’s monthly income differed from the income listed for him on the child support guidelines worksheet attached to the order. Because it is clear from the language in the order that the trial court rejected Appellant’s testimony that his monthly income was approximately $3,300 and accepted Appellee’s evidence that his monthly income was $7,997, we affirm the order on appeal but
2
remand with directions that the trial court attach to its order the worksheet reflecting Appellant’s correct monthly income and child support obligation. See McCants-Collie v. Collie, 909 So. 2d 360, 360 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (finding nothing in the record suggesting that the amount included in the child support guidelines worksheet reflecting the former husband’s gross income was anything more than a typographical error).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions. LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
William S. Graessle and Jonathan W. Graessle of William S. Graessle, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Geraldine C. Hartin, Fleming Island, for Appellee.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- McCANTS-Collie v. Abe Christopher Collie, 909 So. 2d 360 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)