SUZANNE DEERE, APPELLANT,
v.
SARASOTA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD AND INTEGRATED ADMINISTRATORS, APPELLEES
SUZANNE DEERE, APPELLANT,
SARASOTA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD AND INTEGRATED ADMINISTRATORS, APPELLEES
911 So. 2d 1293
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In an earlier appeal, this court remanded this case for the JCC to consider whether appellant demonstrated estoppel. See Deere v. Sarasota County Sch. Bd., 880 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). Appellant had the burden to make this showing. See id. at 826. The JCC found that appellant did not change her position to her detriment based on the E/C’s misrepresentation. Because this finding is supported by the record, we AFFIRM the JCC’s denial of benefits on the ground that the statute of limitations expired.
AFFIRMED.
KAHN, C.J., BARFIELD and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Good v. State, 936 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)…s misinterpretation by filing a timely motion for rehearing but to no avail. The postconviction court denied the motion for rehearing. Good has filed a facially sufficient motion, and the postconviction court must consider it. See Bailey v. State, 911 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Bernal v. State, 892 So. 2d 1086 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Accordingly, we reverse the denial of Good’s motion and remand for the postconviction court to consider the motion on the merits. Reversed and remanded. CASANUEVA and WALLA…
Authorities Cited
- Deere v. Sarasota Cnty. Sch. Bd. & Integrated Administrators, Inc., 880 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)