MORRIS BROWN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A habitual felony offender sentence requires predicate felonies to have been sentenced separately from each other and the current offense. The State failed to prove this requirement.
[1] A habitual felony offender sentence is invalid if the predicate felonies were not sentenced separately from each other and from any other felony conviction counted as a p…
[2] A defendant's motion to correct sentencing error requires the State to present proof of separate sentencing proceedings for predicate felonies used to enhance a sentence.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant was convicted of attempted first-degree murder and sentenced as a habitual felony offender. The predicate felonies used for enhancement were…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Predicate Felony cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Morris Brown appeals his convictions and sentences on three counts of attempted first degree murder. We affirm, without comment, on each of the first three claims of error. However, we reverse and remand for a new sentencing hearing on the conviction for the third count of attempted first degree murder for the reason stated below.
The trial court sentenced Brown to life imprisonment as a habitual felony offender, pursuant to section 775.084, Florida Statutes, for the conviction on count three. For such a sentence to be validly imposed, the predicate felonies “must have resulted in a conviction sentenced separately prior to the current offense and sentenced separately from any other felony conviction that is to be counted as a prior felony.” § 775.084(5), Fla. Stat. (2002).
In Brown’s case, the predicate felonies used to enhance the sentence in count three were all imposed on October 5, 1999. The State contends it is possible the sentences were imposed in separate proceedings, thus the enhanced sentence is proper. However, proof of separate proceedings was not presented to the court during sentencing nor during the hearing on Brown’s motion to correct sentencing error, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2).
In accordance with our prior rulings, we reject the State’s argument and remand for a new sentencing hearing, where the State may “introduce evidence of other qualifying convictions which would allow for a habitual felony offender sentence, should any exist.” See Puskac v. State, 872 So. 2d 1008, 1008 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (relying upon Richardson v. State, 884 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), supplemented on reh’g, 29 Fla. L. Weekly D215 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan. 14, 2004)); see also Petruny v. State, 884 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). As we did in Richardson, Puskac, and Petruny, we certify conflict with McCall v. State, 862 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), and related cases from the other district courts.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.
GUNTHER, STONE and STEVENSON, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Brown, 940 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 2006)…PER CURIAM. We have for review Brown v. State, 912 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal cited with approval its decision in Richardson v. State, 884 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), reh’g granted in part, 884 So. 2d 950, 952 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), quashed, 915 So. 2d 86 (Fl…
-
Brown v. State, 944 So. 2d 526 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…PER CURIAM. This case is before us on remand from the Florida Supreme Court which quashed our earlier decision reported at Brown v. State, 912 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). We vacate our opinion issued on March 9, 2005 and replace it with the following opinion. The appellant, Morris Brown, appeals his convictions and sentences on three counts of attempted first degree murder. We affirm, without c…
Authorities Cited
- Erick Richardson v. State, 884 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
- McCALL v. State, 862 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
- Puskac v. State, 872 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
- Petruny v. State, 884 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
- Insko v. State, 884 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)